Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-06-07 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting an 81 score against 71.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version, so it offers some additional features and some performance improvements. The LG G7 ThinQ is a somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), even when both were only released 0 months apart.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG G7 ThinQ features a way better screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a quite larger display, a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a much higher pixel quantity per inch of screen.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) features a bit longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a better resolution back-facing camera, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
The LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.