Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 5.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has an overall score of 78.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 global score. LG V10's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's just a little heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V10 has older 5.1 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with just a bit better processing power than LG V10, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although they are slower). LG V10 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a bit bigger display, a lot greater number of pixels per inch of display and a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The LG V10 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with more mega pixels. The LG V10 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with a bit better battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V10 costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.