Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 score. LG Velvet is a newer device, and it's also just a little lighter and a little thinner than the Galaxy J7 V (2018). The LG Velvet features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a bigger screen, a way higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a greater number of pixels per display inch.
LG Velvet counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Velvet also has 4 GB more RAM memory. LG Velvet features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a lot better video resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 30 percent greater battery size.
LG Velvet costs a little more than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.