Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), with a global score of 89.6 against 71.9. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola edge's body is newer, but a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018).
The Motorola edge features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola edge also has 4 GB more RAM. The Motorola edge features a sharper screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a greater display pixels density, a bigger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Motorola edge has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola edge counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Motorola edge shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way higher video resolution.
Motorola edge is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.