Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is much better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), with an 83.4 score against 71.9. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has the older 13 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a just a little bit heavier phone than Galaxy J7 V (2018), but both of them are equally thin.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an incredibly better display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a larger display and a better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 39% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.