Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting a global score of 80 against 71.9. The Motorola One Zoom design is newer, but just a little heavier and just a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). Motorola One Zoom features a better looking display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a way better amount of pixels per inch of display, a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display.
Motorola One Zoom has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has more RAM memory. The Motorola One Zoom shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola One Zoom counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 21% more battery capacity.
The Motorola One Zoom is way more expensive than Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.