Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 240.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting an 87 score against 71.9. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has the older 11 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit heavier than Galaxy J7 V (2018), it's just a bit thinner and notably newer.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2020) features a more vivid display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a lot higher 876 x 2142 resolution, a greater pixels number in each inch of screen and a quite larger display.
Motorola razr (2020) has a much greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Motorola razr (2020) captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much more megapixels back camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy J7 V (2018) has improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy J7 V (2018). So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy J7 V (2018), giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.