Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView has an overall score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s score of 71.9. Although the Nokia 9 PureView and the Galaxy J7 V (2018) were only released 9 months apart, the Nokia 9 PureView is just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a way better looking display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a little bigger display, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen. The Nokia 9 PureView has a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a battery duration that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) one, although the Nokia 9 PureView also has a 3320mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The Nokia 9 PureView captures a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy J7 V (2018). If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.