Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is way better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), having a general score of 90.8 against 71.9. Galaxy A51 5G's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's a little heavier. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy A51 5G features a brighter display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a larger display, way more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a little better processing power than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 36% more battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.