Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting a score of 91.3 against 71.9. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is way newer and a bit thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy A52 5G features a brighter screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a larger screen, a much higher display pixels density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a camera with much more MP and a lot higher (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A52 5G has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.