Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting an 87.5 score against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy A71 features a little better processing power than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much better looking display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a higher screen pixels density, a larger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a way better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features better battery duration than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.