Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), having a score of 92.9 against 71.9. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is newer and a little thinner, but just a little heavier than the Galaxy J7 V (2018).
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little faster CPU than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bigger screen and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher resolution camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with better battery duration than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.