Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 240.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), with a 97.6 score against 71.9. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a newer and incredibly thinner phone than Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it is also incredibly heavier. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior processing unit than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a better looking display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much higher 1536 x 2152 resolution, a lot larger display and more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features improved battery performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.