Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), having a 90.8 score against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is much newer and a little thinner than Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s, although it is a little heavier. Galaxy Note 20 has a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much better looking screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a larger screen, a much better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a greater pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in low light environments and a back camera with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy J7 V (2018). If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy J7 V (2018), giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.