Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting a global score of 98.9 against 71.9. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), although it is heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a bigger screen, a lot better pixel number per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more MP back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with greater battery life than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.