Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 80.7, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an notably older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but Samsung could make it just a little lighter and just a little thinner.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 3 also has an extra graphics processing unit and a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 3 features a way better display than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a way higher resolution of 1920 x 1080, a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger display.
The Galaxy Note 3 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy Note 3 has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 64 GB against 400 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy J7 V (2018) has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The Galaxy Note 3 is a little more expensive than Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.