Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is way better than Galaxy J7 V (2018), with an 88.3 score against 71.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy S10's body is newer, lighter and just a little thinner than Galaxy J7 V (2018).
Galaxy S10 has a greater performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a quite larger display, a lot higher display pixels density and a much better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations. Galaxy S10 counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a little better battery duration than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy S10 costs more than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.