Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting a 90.8 score against 71.9. Even though Galaxy S20 FE is just a little heavier than Galaxy J7 V (2018), it's a bit thinner and notably newer. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S20 FE has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a way higher number of pixels per inch of display and a larger display. The Galaxy S20 FE features a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 FE shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a camera with lesser MP resolution and a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better video resolution.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 FE is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.