Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is much newer than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), it is a bit thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a larger screen and a way better pixels quantity per display inch.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.