Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-07 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.38 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is way better than Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting a general score of 90.7 against 71.9. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way thinner and lighter cellphone than Galaxy J7 V (2018).
Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the display, a bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088. Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with a way higher 200 mega pixels resolution. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.