Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Polycarbonate |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S4 has an overall score of 76.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s global score of 71.9. The Galaxy S4 body is notably lighter and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), although it was released many years before. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Galaxy S4 has the previous 4.4.2 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy S4 has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and much more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S4, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 400 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S4 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 2 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy S4 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy S4 features a camera that's just as good as the Galaxy J7 V (2018) one, and although the Samsung Galaxy S4 has a lot tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the same resolution camera and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a 27% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S4 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.