Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-07 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting a 79.5 score against 71.9. Galaxy S7's construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy S7 has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much higher number of pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM. The Galaxy S7 has a bit better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S7 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy J7 V (2018) has more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage, the Galaxy J7 V (2018) also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Galaxy J7 V (2018) has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.