Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 240.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting a overall score of 92.3 against 71.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a little heavier than Galaxy J7 V (2018), it's thinner and newer.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a larger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a way higher pixel amount per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery duration is very similar to Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s battery life.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a less mega pixels back-facing camera and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.