Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| -- | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a general score of 82.2, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s general score of 71.9. Xiaomi Mi 9T's body is newer, but just a bit thicker and a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T features a little bit better performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a better looking screen than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a lot better display pixels density and a larger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a slightly better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T has improved battery performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.