Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-07 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is better than the Galaxy J7 V (2018)'s 71.9 score. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version while Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), although it's just a little thicker and a little heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a larger screen and a lot better pixel quantity per display inch. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.