Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F3 is much better than Galaxy J7 V (2018), with an 87.3 score against 71.9. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F3 has the older 11 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Poco F3 is a much newer and a little bit thinner phone than Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it is just a little heavier.
Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a quite superior processing power than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F3 has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a larger display, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Poco F3 has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot more megapixels back camera.
Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 37 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.