Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), getting an 81.6 score against 71.9. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), it is a little thicker and heavier.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a larger display, a higher number of pixels per display inch and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 144 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels and a much higher video quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.