Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), with a overall score of 81.1 against 71.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018). Both devices we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a higher screen pixels density, a larger display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.