Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-07 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than Galaxy J7 V (2018), having a 79 score against 71.9. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is newer than the Galaxy J7 V (2018), it is heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 11 version and Galaxy J7 V (2018) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has a larger display, more pixels per inch in the screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a little faster CPU than Galaxy J7 V (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a lot better camera than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a camera in the back with way more MP. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 V (2018), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S costs a little more money than Samsung Galaxy J7 V (2018), but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.