Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.6 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop | Android 4.0 |
| 2015-07-23 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.00 x 3.09 x 0.30 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 140.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J7, with a score of 71.5 against 68.6. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version while Samsung Galaxy J7 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Galaxy S III Cricket is a way lighter but thicker device than Samsung Galaxy J7.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more 1500 megahertz CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy J7, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1280 x 720px, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 64 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy J7 captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy J7 also has a lot better 13 MP resolution camera in the back and a much bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures.
Galaxy J7 counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S III Cricket is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.