Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-06-28 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is a bit better than the Galaxy J8, getting a 77 score against 76.7. The LG G7 Fit body is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than Galaxy J8, even when both of them were released only a few months apart. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and Galaxy J8 has Android 10 version.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a little larger screen and a lot better screen pixel density. LG G7 Fit counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J8, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy J8 and LG G7 Fit both feature quite similar processing units, and although the LG G7 Fit has lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), they both have the same RAM amount. LG G7 Fit counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture and a smaller camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy J8 counts with a bit better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.