Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-06-28 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 is slightly better than Galaxy J8, with a 78.6 score against 76.7. LG V10 is a better phone than the Galaxy J8, it must be told that it's also a notably older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier phone. These phones have Android OS, but the LG V10 has the older 5.1 version and Galaxy J8 has Android 10.
The LG V10 has a way better display than Galaxy J8, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixels quantity per display inch and a way higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy J8 features a bit faster processor than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy J8 also has a higher number of 1800 MHz cores.
The LG V10 captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy J8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 16 mega-pixels resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
LG V10 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J8, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy J8 counts with a little longer battery life than LG V10, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.