Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-28 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy J8, getting a general score of 81.3 against 76.7. The LG V35 ThinQ is a somewhat lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than Galaxy J8, even when both of them were released only a couple months apart. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better screen than Galaxy J8, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a lot better count of pixels per inch in the display and a much better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy J8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J8, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy J8 has a bit longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have a 16 mega-pixels camera in the back, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.