Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-28 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a lot better than Galaxy J8, having a general score of 92.8 against 76.7. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a newer 12 version while Galaxy J8 has Android 10, providing the user some extra features and some performance improvements. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's construction is much newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy J8's, although it's a bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy J8, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a higher display density and a quite bigger display. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J8, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy J8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy J8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing images or video in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.