Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-28 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy J8, with an 87.1 score against 76.7. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy J8. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy J8 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy J8 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy J8, because it has a greater screen pixel density, a little bit bigger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy J8, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy J8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.