Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-28 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy J8's overall score of 76.7. Even when Galaxy A50 and the Galaxy J8 were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy A50 is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. Galaxy A50 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy J8. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A50 features a better screen than Galaxy J8, because it has a higher pixel density, a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50 captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J8, and although they both have a 0.36 inches camera sensor, a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy A50 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.