Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-28 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than Samsung Galaxy J8, having a 97.6 score against 76.7. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy J8 has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features. Galaxy Fold's design is newer and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy J8's, but it is also heavier.
The Galaxy Fold features a much better screen than Galaxy J8, because it has a way better 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution, a larger screen and a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J8, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy J8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality, a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.