Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-28 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the Galaxy J8, getting a general score of 93.6 against 76.7. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy J8 has Android 10, so it gives you some additional features and enhanced performance. Galaxy S10 5G is a newer and a little bit thinner phone than Galaxy J8, although it's also somewhat heavier.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy J8, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3040 resolution, a lot higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy S10 5G has a very superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy J8, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy J8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy J8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy S10 5G captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has a camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.