Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-28 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.24 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J8, with a overall score of 82.6 against 76.7. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy J8 has Android 10, giving you a lot of extra features and optimized performance. The Galaxy S25 construction is notably lighter and way thinner than Samsung Galaxy J8.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy J8, because it has a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit larger screen and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy J8 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Galaxy J8 features a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy J8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels, a lot larger camera sensor and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy J8, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.