Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy J8, with a global score of 81 against 76.7. Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy J8, but it's thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy J8 has Android 10.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy J8. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J8, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, a F1.7 aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.