Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-13 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy M01's score of 74.7. The iPhone 12 Pro Max design is heavier but incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy M01, and they were released with only a few months difference. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy M01 works with Android 11 OS.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a better performing CPU than Galaxy M01, because although it has 2 less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy M01, because it has a lot higher 1284 x 2778 resolution, a much higher pixels count per inch of screen and a bigger display.
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M01, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M01 counts with just a bit better battery life than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3687mAh.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy M01, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a lot bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.