Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than Samsung Galaxy M01, having a score of 88.1 against 74.7. The iPhone X is a older and a little bit heavier device than Samsung Galaxy M01, but Apple made it much thinner anyway. The iPhone X has a better hardware performance than Galaxy M01, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone X features a lot better display than Galaxy M01, because it has a way greater pixels amount per screen inch, a little bit bigger screen and a much better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Apple iPhone X has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M01 features a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. IPhone X has a superior camera than Galaxy M01, because although it has a worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.