Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M01, with a overall score of 82 against 74.7. IPhone XR's body is somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M01, although it is heavier and was released around 20 months before. The Apple iPhone XR has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, a quite better resolution of 828 x 1792px and a little bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy M01 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Apple iPhone XR counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy M01, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a superior camera than Galaxy M01, because although it has a back camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture. Galaxy M01 has superior battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.