Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is better than Galaxy M01's 74.7 overall score. Even though Apple iPhone XS is older and just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy M01, it's design is still thinner. Apple iPhone XS counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a little bit larger display, a way better display density and a much better resolution of 1125 x 2436.
The iPhone XS features a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a higher amount of RAM memory. Apple iPhone XS shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy M01, because although it has a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy M01 has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M01 counts with a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.