Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M01's general score of 74.7. The Google Pixel 3 design is way thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M01, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more more than a year before. The Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a lot better 1080 x 2160 resolution. The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy M01, because although it has a lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video, a bigger camera sensor and a way better (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy M01 has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M01 features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.