Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than the Galaxy M01, having an 81.9 score against 74.7. Google Pixel 4's body is a bit lighter and thinner than Galaxy M01, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 features a better screen than Galaxy M01, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Google Pixel 4 also has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a much greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy M01 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M01 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size. Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way larger aperture, a larger sensor capturing better quality pictures and videos and a much higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.