Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is much better than the Galaxy M01's 74.7 overall score. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL and Galaxy M01 were only released 7 months apart, the Google Pixel 4 XL body is somewhat heavier but also thinner than Galaxy M01. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a quite larger screen, a much better 1440 x 3040px resolution and a much greater pixel number per inch of display. The Galaxy M01 features a superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a back camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot larger aperture and a way higher video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy M01 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.