Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is better than the Galaxy M01, having a score of 82.9 against 74.7. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features. Even though Google Pixel 4a and Galaxy M01 were released with only a couple of months difference, Google Pixel 4a is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a lot greater pixel number per inch of screen, a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little larger screen. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a has a bit better camera than Galaxy M01, because although it has a lesser megapixels camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lot bigger aperture and a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy M01 features superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.