Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is better than the Galaxy M01's overall score of 74.7. The Google Pixel 5 construction is lighter and much thinner than the Galaxy M01, although both were released only 5 months apart. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit superior processor than Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little bit bigger screen and a greater pixel amount in each inch of screen. The Google Pixel 5 takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a much larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a larger sensor.
Google Pixel 5 has a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 5 has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy M01, because it has a 2% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.