Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 295 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M01's general score of 74.7. These phones come with Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11. The HTC One M9 design is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy M01, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before.
The HTC One M9 counts with a better processing power than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also has a 64 bits processor and a GPU. The HTC One M9 features an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy M01 features a much greater memory for applications and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy M01 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The HTC One M9 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a camera with a way better 20 mega-pixels resolution, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy M01 features a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.